Follow Us


Menu
Log in

For Business        For Academia         For Practitioners        For Students       Jobs Board

About NLA        Why NLA        Join NLA




Leadership Education Standards

The following standards equate to an NLA-approved institution in the field of leadership education:

Curriculum Design

An NLA-approved program must demonstrate a comprehensive, structured, and scientifically grounded leadership curriculum that includes:

  1. Curricular Scope and Structure
    A well-designed curriculum covering strategic leadership, organizational behavior, ethics, communication, decision-making, cultural dynamics, cognitive aspects of leadership, and other scientifically relevant areas.

  2. Learning Objectives and Outcomes
    Clearly articulated learning outcomes for every course and program, aligned with the development of essential leadership competencies, including cognitive, behavioral, ethical, analytical, and interpersonal dimensions.

  3. Integration of Theory and Practice
    Balanced incorporation of theoretical and practical components, including case analyses, simulations, experiential learning, practice-based projects, leadership diagnostics, and real-world application.

  4. Management Coursework Limitation
    Management-related coursework may support breadth of knowledge but must not exceed 30 percent of the total curriculum in any program labeled as leadership or leaderology.

  5. Core Leadership Coursework Requirements

    • Bachelor’s Degree:
      Approximately 40–50 percent of coursework must be dedicated to foundational leadership principles, including leadership theory, history, organizational behavior, communication, decision-making, ethics, and interdisciplinary leadership studies.

    • Master’s Degree:
      Approximately 60–70 percent of coursework must emphasize advanced leadership theory, organizational change, leadership ethics, global leadership, developmental theory, and specialized leadership applications.

    • Doctoral Degree:
      Approximately 70–80 percent of coursework must focus on advanced leadership constructs, complex systems leadership, leadership cognition, interdisciplinary theory integration, and methodological training.

  6. Electives and Concentrations
    Elective pathways or concentrations must deepen expertise in specific leadership sub-fields, including but not limited to organizational leadership, strategic leadership, sports leadership, healthcare leadership, nonprofit leadership, or military leadership.

  7. Research, Capstone, and Applied Inquiry
    Programs must dedicate 10–20 percent of total coursework to capstones, applied research projects, or thesis work demonstrating mastery of leadership science.

  8. Doctoral Dissertation Requirements
    Doctoral programs must designate 20–30 percent of total program effort to original research that contributes meaningfully to the leadership knowledge base. Dissertations must employ empirical, theoretical, or methodological rigor consistent with social science standards.

  9. Program Orientation Note
    Programs intending to prepare graduates for predominantly managerial roles should incorporate additional management coursework and may be better classified as management degrees rather than leadership or leaderology degrees.

Faculty Qualifications and Expertise

  1. Academic Qualifications
    Faculty must hold advanced degrees in leadership or closely aligned social science disciplines. Preference is given to individuals recognized as Leaderologist I or II, whether formally verified or not.

  2. Demonstrated Expertise
    Faculty must show evidence of competence in leadership theory, research methodology, leadership practice, and interdisciplinary scholarship.

  3. Professional Development
    Faculty must engage in ongoing development to remain current with emerging research, trends, and advancements in leadership science.

Assessment and Evaluation

  1. Evaluation of Student Outcomes
    Programs must utilize rigorous assessment methods including examinations, research projects, applied assignments, presentations, diagnostics, and reflective evaluations.

  2. Program Evaluation and Continuous Improvement
    Institutions must implement regular review cycles informed by data from students, alumni, employers, and external stakeholders.

  3. Alignment with Leadership-Specific Accreditation Expectations
    Programs must demonstrate quality assurance processes consistent with standards for a scientific discipline.

Industry Partnerships and Experiential Learning

  1. Real-World Application
    Institutions must collaborate with organizations, community partners, and industry leaders to provide meaningful practical experiences, internships, or applied leadership projects.

  2. Professional Networking Opportunities
    Programs should provide structured opportunities for engagement with leaders across sectors through guest lectures, seminars, conferences, and leadership forums.

  3. Global and Technological Integration
    Curricula must demonstrate awareness of technological advancements, global contexts, and evolving trends relevant to leadership practice.

Research and Scholarship

  1. Faculty and Student Research Engagement
    Programs must encourage active participation in leadership scholarship, contributing to the advancement of leadership science.

  2. Publication and Dissemination
    Institutions should support faculty and students in publishing research and presenting at conferences or scholarly gatherings.

  3. Community and Disciplinary Engagement
    Active participation in leadership communities, collaborative initiatives, and interdisciplinary research is expected.

Review and Refinement

These standards constitute the baseline requirements for NLA approval. They are reviewed periodically and refined as necessary to reflect the ongoing evolution and scientific advancement of leadership and leaderology as a discipline.

Review A Sample Leadership Curriculum

Updated: 12/8/25

Privacy Statement
Terms of Use 
Registered 501(c)(6)

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software