Articles

Many on LinkedIn will tell you that consistency is critical to success, but what does that actually mean? Indeed, whether in business, personal development, or sports, consistency can lead to significant achievements. However, the part that is often overlooked is that there are two distinct types of consistency: the repetition of tasks and the relentless and agile pursuit of a goal. Both have their merits, but both are necessary at different times.

Type One: Repetition of Task

Definition:

The first type of consistency involves repeating the same motions, actions, or activities with the expectation of achieving the same result. This approach relies on the belief that persistence through repetition will eventually yield success.

Pros:

• Habit Formation: Repetition of tasks can help form habits, which can streamline processes and make actions more automatic.
• Skill Mastery: Repeating a task can lead to the development of expertise. Indeed, practice is fundamental in many fields, including complex problem-solving.
• Predictability: This approach provides a sense of predictability and stability, which can be comforting and reduce decision fatigue.

Cons:

• Stagnation: Repeating the same actions can lead to stagnation, especially if the environment or circumstances change.
• Inefficiency: This method can become inefficient if the repeated actions do not lead to the desired outcomes.
• Lack of Innovation: A strict adherence to repetition can stifle creativity and innovation, essential components of growth and improvement.

Scientific Support:

Behavioral psychology supports the idea that repetition can reinforce behaviors, making them more ingrained and automatic. This principle is the basis of habit formation theories such as those proposed by Charles Duhigg in "The Power of Habit."

Type Two: Relentless and Agile Pursuit of a Goal

Definition:

A relentless and agile pursuit of a goal characterizes the second type of consistency. This approach involves flexibility, adaptability, and a willingness to change tactics to achieve the desired outcome.

Pros:

• Adaptability: This method allows for adjustments based on feedback and changing circumstances, increasing the chances of success.
• Innovation: The willingness to try new approaches fosters innovation and creativity, which is essential for overcoming obstacles and achieving goals.
• Resilience: This approach builds resilience as it requires persistence and the ability to bounce back from failures and setbacks.

Cons:

• Complexity: This approach can be more complex and demanding, requiring constant evaluation and adjustment. In other words, it requires you to be "pro."
• Uncertainty: The lack of a fixed routine can create uncertainty and anxiety for individuals who struggle with change. 
• Resource Intensive: This method can be resource-intensive, requiring more time, energy, and sometimes financial investment in things like skill development. This also requires self-awareness to know what skills and resources you may not have or need to improve.

Scientific and Leadership Theories Support:

Agile Leadership methodologies, popularized in software development, emphasize iterative progress, flexibility, and customer feedback. This approach has been shown to lead to more innovative and user-centered solutions. Similarly, Carol Dweck's research on "growth mindset" supports the idea that viewing challenges as opportunities to learn and adapt can lead to greater success.

The Football Analogy

Imagine that you are the coach of a football team, and you are building the strategy for the big game. The truth is that relying solely on the first type of consistency—repeating the same play over and over—would likely result in failure. Your opponents would quickly adapt and neutralize your strategy.

In contrast, the second type of consistency, where a team uses diverse plays and adapts to the game's unfolding dynamics, increases the likelihood of success. This adaptability allows the team to navigate obstacles and exploit opportunities as they arise. However, this approach requires the team to know more than one play and be proficient at each of them.

The type of proficiency required to win demands that the first type of consistency is used before the game. This means the players must practice each play repeatedly to become more proficient. By doing so, they will be better prepared to adapt and be agile (using various plays) in the face of adversity during the game, which will rely solely on the second type of consistency. 

The Manufacturing/Tech Business Analogy

Imagine that you are the CEO of a manufacturing or tech company, and you are planning the strategy for product development. Relying solely on the first type of consistency—repeating the same production processes or development methods without variation—would likely result in stagnation. Competitors will soon surpass your company by adopting more innovative approaches.

In contrast, the second type of consistency, where the company continuously adapts and evolves its processes and methods to meet changing market demands, increases the likelihood of success. This adaptability allows the company to navigate market shifts, incorporate new technologies, and exploit emerging opportunities. However, this approach requires the company to master diverse skills and methodologies first.

The type of proficiency required to excel demands that the first type of consistency is used in the initial phases. This means that employees need to repeatedly practice and refine foundational skills and processes to achieve a high level of proficiency. Doing so makes them better prepared to implement and adapt new strategies and technologies in response to market changes.

For example, software developers might initially focus on mastering a specific programming language or development framework in a tech company through repeated practice. Once they have achieved a high level of proficiency, they can then more effectively pivot to new languages, frameworks, or development methodologies as required by evolving project needs. This dual approach ensures that the company remains competitive and innovative while maintaining a strong foundation of technical expertise.

The 'Superpower' of Consistency

If your current strategy of repeating the same efforts isn’t yielding the desired results, take a moment to evaluate which type of consistency you are relying on. It may be time to shift from routine repetition to a more dynamic, flexible approach. Embracing this change can foster innovation, adaptability, and ultimately, lead to achieving your goals.

However, just remember that type two doesn’t work without type one. The effectiveness of a dynamic approach relies on a solid foundation established through consistent learning, deliberate practice, and skill development. And beware of falling into the False Dilemma Fallacy, where people believe they must choose one type over the other. Don't be reluctant to admit when your foundations could use improvement. And finally, recognize that times of uncertainty or stagnation often signal the need to revisit type one.

In closing, I'll say that while consistency can indeed be a superpower, true mastery lies in knowing when to apply each type effectively. Repeating tasks is valuable for skill and habit development, but it is the relentless and agile pursuit of a goal that often leads to enduring success.

Unfortunately, many discussions about leadership often devolve into listing characteristics and traits that leaders should possess. While some of these attributes are undoubtedly important, listing characteristics and traits does not capture the full essence of what true leadership is or entails. The science of leadership transcends these lists, requiring a deeper understanding of many principles and strategies. However, two fundamental principles stand out: the distinction between leadership and management and the critical role of vision.

Leadership vs. Management

The differences between leadership and management cannot be stressed enough because a common misconception is that leadership and management are interchangeable. Although they are sometimes related, the truth is that they serve very different purposes and require distinct skill sets. 

For clarity, management is about maintaining and optimizing processes. It involves planning, organizing, and coordinating resources to achieve specific objectives. Managers ensure that day-to-day operations run smoothly and efficiently. Their focus is on stability, control, and the execution of established strategies.

Conversely, leadership is more about strategy, setting direction, and inspiring people to achieve ideal outcomes. Leaders create a vision for the future and motivate others to achieve it. They foster innovation, encourage risk-taking, and guide their teams through change and uncertainty. For clarity, leadership is inherently about movement and transformation, whereas management is about maintaining the status quo.

This is not to say that one is better than the other. However, the distinction is crucial because an effective organization needs both strong leadership and competent management. Without leadership, an organization lacks direction and the ability to adapt to new challenges. Without management, even the best vision can flounder due to poor execution.

The Importance of Vision

You cannot have an honest discussion about leadership without including some element of vision. Vision is the ability to see beyond the present and imagine what could be. It involves setting a clear, compelling direction that inspires and mobilizes people towards a common goal. Vision is not just about having grand ideas; it’s about translating those ideas into achievable outcomes.

Vision provides a roadmap for the future. It defines the destination and outlines the steps necessary to get there – which requires strategy. This forward-looking perspective is essential for navigating the complexities and uncertainties, especially in this modern business environment where uncertainty is around every corner.

A leader’s vision must be compelling enough to galvanize action. It should resonate with the values and aspirations of the team, providing a sense of purpose and direction. That is why I often say that managers start at the beginning, but leaders must always begin at the end. When people understand and buy into the vision, they are more likely to commit their energy and creativity to making it a reality.

Furthermore, vision guides decision-making. In times of uncertainty or conflict, a clear vision helps leaders make choices that are aligned with long-term goals. Moreover, the vision serves as a touchstone, ensuring that all short-term actions contribute to the desired outcome.

Vision and Outcomes

Leadership is inherently outcome-oriented. A leader’s success is ultimately measured by their ability to achieve desired results. Vision and outcomes are inextricably linked; a vision without corresponding outcomes is merely a dream, while outcomes without a guiding vision can lack coherence and sustainability.

If you truly want to be a leader, you must focus on both the process (strategy) and the end result (vision). You need to set clear objectives, develop strategies to achieve them, and continuously monitor progress. Of course, effective leaders balance the need for immediate results with the pursuit of long-term goals. Either way, one thing is for certain: you’re going to need a lot more than characteristics and traits to get you there.

The Bigger Point

Indeed, leadership is many things, but the point is that leadership goes well beyond a simple list of traits. It involves understanding the fundamental difference between leadership and management, and recognizing the centrality of vision in driving outcomes. Beware of the memes and articles suggesting that leadership is merely about catering to emotions; many of these are more reflective of wishful thinking than any leadership reality.

In fact, I would argue that catering to emotions can be dangerous and derail progress toward the desired outcome, as those seeking such catering often have different objectives in mind, and letting them go might hurt their feelings. By focusing on these core principles, leaders can navigate their organizations towards success, fostering innovation, and inspiring their teams to reach their full potential.

Remember: true leadership requires us to create a compelling future and mobilize people to achieve it - along with all of the elements that help make that happen.  It's so much more than what we typically see on social media feeds. In my opinion, it's time we stop reducing this dynamic science into contorted memes.

The 150th New York Infantry Regiment, known as the "Dutchess County Regiment," played a crucial role in some of the most significant campaigns of the American Civil War. Comprised of brave men from Dutchess County and surrounding areas, the regiment's journey from its formation in 1862 to the final muster in 1865 is a testament to their dedication and valor. Among these men was Private Thomas Willis Benham, whose personal story of service, capture, and ultimate sacrifice epitomizes the courage and resilience of the Union soldiers. This narrative delves into the regiment's key engagements, including the Battle of Gettysburg and Sherman's Atlanta Campaign, highlighting the contributions and sacrifices of the 150th New York Infantry and Private Benham in preserving the Union and shaping the nation's history.

The story of the 150th New York Infantry Regiment and Private Thomas Willis Benham is a profound example of how followership, the commitment and support shown by individuals within a collective effort, played a critical role in shaping the United States and preserving its unity during the Civil War. The regiment’s journey and Benham’s personal sacrifices illustrate how dedicated followership contributed to the Union’s success and the ultimate unification of the nation.

Formation and Early Service: The 150th New York Infantry Regiment, known as the "Dutchess County Regiment" or the "Dutchess Legion," was organized under Colonel John H. Ketcham on August 27, 1862. The regiment, composed of men primarily from Dutchess County, was mustered into service on October 10 and 11, 1862, in Poughkeepsie, New York, for a three-year term. The regiment included men of excellent character and dedication, such as Private Thomas Willis Benham from Amenia, New York, who would join later.

Thomas Willis Benham was married to Thankful Marshall on November 5, 1851, by the Reverend William J. Allyn as recorded in the Connecticut, U.S., Town Marriage Records.  In June of 1862 Thomas and Thankful had five children, Clarence - 9, Earl Smith Benham - 7, Thomas Jr - 5, Homer - 2, and Hattie - 5 months old.  Thomas was working as a farm laborer at this time trying to make ends meet.  When he enlisted he received a $50 bounty and $10 premium pay. 

Initial Deployment: After leaving New York on October 11, 1862, the regiment performed garrison and guard duty in Baltimore, Maryland, as part of the Middle Department, 8th Corps. This duty lasted until July 1863, when they were assigned to the 2nd Brigade, 1st Division, 12th Corps, Army of the Potomac.

Thomas Willis Benham’s Service: Thomas Willis Benham, born in 1829 in Amenia, New York, enlisted in June 1863 and Joined the regiment in the field June 11, 1863, at the age of 34.  This date is just a few weeks before the Battle of Gettysburg, which took place from July 1 to July 3, 1863.  He joined as a private in Company A of the 150th New York Infantry Regiment.

The 150th New York Infantry Regiment was part of the 2nd Brigade, 1st Division, 12th Corps, Army of the Potomac. By late June 1863, the Union Army was mobilizing in response to the Confederate invasion of Pennsylvania, leading up to the Battle of Gettysburg.

Given that Thomas Willis Benham joined the regiment June 11, 1863, and the 150th New York Infantry Regiment was actively engaged in the Battle of Gettysburg starting on July 2, it is believed that Benham participated in this significant battle. His presence with the regiment during this period aligns with the regiment's documented movements and actions at Gettysburg. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that Thomas Willis Benham did indeed fight at Gettysburg.

Battle of Gettysburg: One of the 150th New York Infantry’s most significant engagements was the Battle of Gettysburg in July 1863.  This battle was their first major engagement. The regiment arrived on July 2 and played a crucial role in reinforcing Union positions on the right flank. Later, they were ordered to support General Sedgwick on the extreme left, advancing under heavy fire and capturing three pieces of artillery from the enemy. The regiment's bravery was evident, with 45 casualties, and they fought with remarkable courage.

The regiment's engagement at the Battle of Gettysburg is a notable instance of followership. Despite being a relatively new unit, the 150th New York Infantry played a crucial role in reinforcing Union positions under intense fire. Private Benham, who joined shortly before this pivotal battle, exemplified the courage and resilience of his regiment. Their effective support and brave actions, even in the face of casualties, were instrumental in the Union’s strategic success at Gettysburg.

In September 1863, the 150th moved with the 12th Corps to Tennessee, joining the Army of the Cumberland. They were stationed along the railroad between Murfreesboro and Bridgeport, providing essential security and support.

Atlanta Campaign: In April 1864, the 12th Corps was reorganized into the 20th Corps. The 150th, part of the 2nd Brigade, 1st Division, joined General William Tecumseh Sherman’s Atlanta Campaign. They participated in significant battles, including Resaca, Cassville, Dallas, Kennesaw Mountain, and Peachtree Creek, culminating in the Siege of Atlanta. Thomas Willis Benham would have certainly been involved in these battles.  Over four months, they sustained more than 100 casualties.

The following are short summaries of these battles which Thomas Willis Benham would have been in.

Battle of Resaca (May 13-15, 1864)

• Location: Resaca, Georgia
• Synopsis: Part of General William T. Sherman’s Atlanta Campaign, the Battle of Resaca involved Sherman’s Union forces attempting to outflank and engage General Joseph E. Johnston’s Confederate Army. After several days of skirmishing and direct attacks, both sides incurred significant casualties, but Johnston's forces eventually withdrew south, allowing Sherman to continue his advance toward Atlanta.

Battle of Cassville (May 19, 1864)

• Location: Cassville, Georgia
• Synopsis: Following their withdrawal from Resaca, Johnston's Confederate forces took up defensive positions near Cassville. Sherman’s forces maneuvered to attack, prompting Johnston to abandon his strong position. Johnston initially planned to launch a counterattack but ultimately decided to retreat further south, continuing the Confederates' strategic withdrawal.

Battle of Dallas (May 26-June 1, 1864)

• Location: Dallas, Georgia
• Synopsis: As Sherman’s forces advanced toward Atlanta, they encountered Johnston's army near Dallas. The battle involved several days of intense skirmishes and assaults. Although the Confederates managed to slow the Union advance temporarily, they could not stop Sherman’s forces, which continued their strategic flanking movements, eventually forcing the Confederates to fall back again.

Battle of Kennesaw Mountain (June 27, 1864)

• Location: Kennesaw Mountain, Georgia
• Synopsis: One of the most significant engagements of the Atlanta Campaign, the Battle of Kennesaw Mountain saw Sherman’s forces attempting a direct assault on Johnston's well-entrenched positions. The frontal attack resulted in heavy Union casualties without significant gains. Despite this setback, Sherman continued his flanking maneuvers, eventually forcing Johnston to abandon Kennesaw Mountain and retreat toward Atlanta.

Battle of Peachtree Creek (July 20, 1864)

• Location: Near Atlanta, Georgia
• Synopsis: The Battle of Peachtree Creek was one of the initial battles during the Siege of Atlanta. General John Bell Hood, who had replaced Johnston, launched an aggressive attack on Sherman’s forces crossing Peachtree Creek. Despite initial Confederate success, the Union troops held their ground and repelled the assault. This battle marked the beginning of a series of engagements leading to the eventual fall of Atlanta to Sherman’s forces.

During the Atlanta Campaign, Benham was captured by Confederate forces on October 13, 1864, in Atlanta, Georgia.  During the Civil War, Union soldiers captured in or near Atlanta were typically sent to various Confederate prison camps. The most notorious of these was Andersonville, officially known as Camp Sumter, located in Georgia. Andersonville is infamous for its brutal conditions. Of the approximately 45,000 Union soldiers imprisoned there, nearly 13,000 died due to disease, malnutrition, and poor living conditions.

Union soldiers captured near Atlanta, including those involved in the Atlanta Campaign like Thomas Willis Benham, were most likely sent to Andersonville due to its proximity and capacity to handle large numbers of prisoners. The conditions at Andersonville were exceptionally harsh, contributing to its infamous reputation.  In one of the muster records for Thomas Willis Benham it states:  “Absent, taken prisoner of war near Atlanta GA, October 13, 1864, afterwards, discharged and furloughed; on his route to rejoin his regiment was taken sick at Columbus, Ohio.”  Another entry says, “Died, 1 April 1865 of fever contracted in the service, while home in Armenia, NY, on furlough.  Final remarks rendered.”

March to the Sea: Following the fall of Atlanta, the 150th New York Infantry embarked on Sherman’s infamous "March to the Sea" on November 15, 1864. The regiment participated in the siege of Savannah in December, sustaining 20 casualties. Their actions during this campaign significantly disrupted the Confederate war effort by destroying vital supplies and infrastructure.

Campaign Through the Carolinas: In early 1865, the 150th continued through the Carolinas, engaging in battles such as Averasboro and Bentonville. Despite harsh conditions and constant skirmishes, the regiment maintained its effectiveness and morale.

End of Service and Legacy: The regiment marched to Washington, D.C., after the Carolinas Campaign, participating in the Grand Review of the Armies on May 23-24, 1865. The 150th New York Infantry was honorably discharged and mustered out on June 8, 1865, under the command of Colonel Alfred B. Smith. Colonels Ketcham and Smith were promoted to brevet brigadier-general, with Ketcham later advancing to major-general.

The regiment had a total enrollment of approximately 1,300 men, with 2 officers and 49 enlisted men killed or mortally wounded, and 3 officers and 78 enlisted men dying of disease and other causes, totaling 132 deaths. The 150th New York Infantry Regiment’s dedication, bravery, and significant contributions to the Union war effort were critical in achieving Union victory.

The Impact of The 150^th N.Y.’s Followership on the United States

Strategic Contributions

The 150th New York Infantry Regiment’s actions during key campaigns disrupted Confederate operations and supply lines, significantly weakening their ability to sustain the war effort. Their relentless pursuit and engagement in battles across multiple states played a vital role in the broader Union strategy, contributing to eventual victories that were crucial for the preservation of the nation.

Sacrifices and Legacy

Private Thomas Willis Benham’s story, marked by his capture and death due to illness contracted during service, is a poignant reminder of the individual sacrifices that underpinned the Union’s success. These sacrifices were not in vain; they were essential in maintaining the integrity of the United States and ensuring its future as a unified nation. The collective efforts of the 150th New York Infantry and soldiers like Benham helped secure freedoms and set the stage for the nation’s progress.

Ensuring Freedom and Equality

The regiment’s dedication and the ultimate cost paid by many of its members contributed to the abolition of slavery and the establishment of a more equitable society. Their actions, driven by a sense of duty and followership, were fundamental in shaping the future of the United States, ensuring that it remained a land of freedom and opportunity.

Benefit to the United States: The actions of the 150th New York Infantry Regiment, along with the personal sacrifices of soldiers like Thomas Willis Benham, were instrumental in the Union’s success during the Civil War. Their involvement in major battles, such as Gettysburg and the Atlanta Campaign, and strategic movements, like Sherman’s March to the Sea, helped weaken the Confederate forces and disrupt their supply lines. The regiment’s efforts contributed to the preservation of the United States as a unified nation and the eventual abolition of slavery.

Thomas Willis Benham’s story is a heartbreaking reminder of the individual sacrifices made by soldiers and their families. His dedication, even in the face of imprisonment and injury, exemplifies the resilience and commitment of soldiers. The combined efforts of the 150th New York Infantry Regiment and its members not only secured significant military victories but also helped shape the future of the United States, ensuring freedom and equality for future generations.

One Man’s Followership Helped Create This Country

The story of the 150th New York Infantry Regiment and Private Thomas Willis Benham exemplifies how followership, characterized by dedication, sacrifice, and unwavering support for a common cause, was instrumental in preserving the United States during its most challenging period. The regiment’s contributions during key campaigns and the personal sacrifices of its members were crucial in achieving Union victory, maintaining national unity, and shaping the future of the nation. The legacy of their followership endures, reminding us of the profound impact that collective effort and individual commitment can have on the course of history.

Why This Soldier and Not Others

You may wonder why I picked this particular soldier’s story and not some general or more colorful character.  Thomas Willis Benham is my 2^nd Great Grandfather.  His son, Earl Smith Benham, had a daughter, Mary C. Benham, who in turn had a daughter, Marilyn C. Gaden who married my dad, Ernest Fuzie!  When I think of what it must have been like in the 150^th New York regiment in the US Civil War, and know that my 2^nd great grandfather contributed to the outcome of that war at a significant cost to our family and ultimately costing him his life, I am humbled and proud to at least know some of the history that helped create this great country.

About the Author: Dr. Chris Fuzie is the owner of CMF Leadership Consulting and is currently the Business/HR Manager for a District Attorney’s office in California. Chris is a Leaderologist II and President of the National Leaderology Association (NLA) who holds a Doctor of Education (Ed. D), M.A. and B.A. in Organizational Leadership, and has graduate certificates in Human Resources and Criminal Justice Education. Chris is a developer, trainer, consultant for leadership of public, private, profit, and non-profit organizations since 2010. Chris is a graduate of the FBI National Academy and a former National Instructor for the International Association of Chiefs of Police and California P.O.S.T. Courses. Chris is the author of "Liminal Space: Reshaping Leadership and Followership," "Because Why... Understanding Behavior in Exigencies." and of "S.C.O.R.E. Performance Counseling: Save the Relationship, Change the Behavior." Chris is honorably retired from the Modesto Police Department after 28 years of public service leading such teams as the Homicide Team, the Hostage Negotiations Team, the Street-Level Drug Team and the School Police Officer Team.

I was talking with a colleague about aspects of my upcoming book “Liminal Space: Reshaping Leadership and Followership,” and I was asked why I feel it is critically important to train people in behaviors as opposed to leadership and followership traits or roles.  I gave the person a short answer saying, “Behaviors are the actions of leadership and followership that influence others.  The title or role of leader or follower may not make any difference in the situation, but the behavior does.”  We finished our conversation and I walked away asking myself the same question and breaking it down into specific reasons in my mind.  So, I’ll include some of my reasoning and provide some of the sources that help form this thinking.

First, training leader and follower behaviors is more important than solely focusing on leader/follower traits, ideas, or quotes because behaviors are actionable and directly influence interactions within teams and organizations. While traits and quotes can provide valuable insights and inspiration, they do not necessarily translate into tangible actions or change in behavior (Smith & Johnson, 2018).

Training leader and follower behaviors, on the other hand, equips individuals with the skills and competencies needed to effectively lead or follow in various situations. This includes communication skills, conflict resolution, teamwork, and emotional intelligence, which are essential for building strong relationships and collaborative environments (Williams, 2019).

Moreover, focusing on behaviors fosters a culture of continuous learning and improvement, where individuals are encouraged to reflect on their actions and seek feedback for growth and development (Jones, 2020). This approach emphasizes the importance of practice, adaptation, and flexibility, which are crucial for navigating the complexities and challenges of today's dynamic work environment (Brown & Green, 2021).

Training Behaviors and Its Impact on Organizational Culture

Training positive behaviors in organizations has a profound impact on shaping and reinforcing organizational culture. When employees are trained in behaviors such as teamwork, communication, integrity, and adaptability, it fosters a culture that values collaboration, transparency, and continuous improvement (Smith & Johnson, 2018). Positive behaviors serve as the building blocks of organizational culture, influencing how employees interact with each other, approach their work, and contribute to the overall mission and values of the organization (Williams, 2019). 

"Culture eats strategy for breakfast," often attributed to Peter Drucker, a renowned management consultant and educator. This statement highlights the importance of organizational culture and its impact on the success of strategic initiatives.  In the context of training behaviors within organizations, this saying underscores the importance of fostering a positive and supportive culture that aligns with desired behaviors.

Training Behaviors and Its Impact on Employee Engagement

Employee engagement is closely tied to behaviors within the organization. Training positive behaviors in organizations has a significant impact on employee engagement. When employees are trained in behaviors such as open communication, collaboration, and empowerment, it fosters a work environment where employees feel valued, motivated, and invested in their roles (Smith & Johnson, 2018). Positive behaviors create a sense of belonging and purpose, which are key drivers of employee engagement and commitment to the organization's goals and values (Williams, 2019).

Moreover, trained positive behaviors like recognition and feedback help to reinforce a culture of appreciation and continuous improvement, which can boost morale and enhance job satisfaction (Jones, 2020). Additionally, a culture that promotes work-life balance and well-being contributes to higher levels of employee engagement, as employees feel supported in managing their personal and professional lives (Brown & Green, 2021).

Training Behaviors and Its Impact on Team Dynamics

Individual behaviors significantly impact team dynamics. Effective teamwork requires trust, open communication, and mutual respect among team members. Training behaviors that support these qualities can enhance team collaboration and productivity. Trained positive behaviors have a profound impact on team dynamics, influencing both group structural dimensions and group processes. When team members are trained in behaviors such as effective communication, collaboration, trust-building, and conflict resolution, it enhances the structural dimensions of the group by fostering a cohesive and synergistic team environment. Positive behaviors promote clear roles and responsibilities, facilitate better coordination, and encourage mutual respect among team members.

Moreover, trained positive behaviors positively influence group processes by promoting open dialogue, active listening, and collective decision-making. Team members who exhibit these behaviors are more likely to contribute ideas, share feedback, and collaborate effectively, leading to improved problem-solving and innovation within the team.  Overall, trained positive behaviors create a supportive and productive team environment, strengthening both the structural dimensions and processes that drive team performance and success.

Training Behaviors and Its Influence in Critical Thinking and Decision-Making

Behaviors such as critical thinking, ethical decision-making, and accountability are essential for effective decision-making within organizations. Training these behaviors can help employees make informed and ethical decisions that benefit the organization.  When employees are trained in behaviors such as critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and accountability, it fosters a culture of informed and responsible decision-making. Positive behaviors promote a collaborative approach to problem-solving, encouraging employees to consider diverse perspectives, weigh options carefully, and make decisions that align with organizational values and goals.

Also, trained positive behaviors like open communication and constructive feedback facilitate better information sharing and transparency, ensuring that decisions are well-informed and understood by all stakeholders. Additionally, behaviors that promote adaptability and resilience enable organizations to navigate complex and uncertain situations more effectively, leading to more agile and strategic decision-making.  By training positive behaviors not only enhance individual decision-making skills but also contribute to a culture of collective decision-making that is aligned with organizational objectives and values, ultimately driving better outcomes and organizational success.

Training Behaviors and Creating Personal Responsibility and Accountability

Training behaviors emphasizes personal responsibility and accountability. Employees who are accountable for their actions and behavior are more likely to take ownership of their work, learn from mistakes, and contribute to organizational success. Trained positive behaviors significantly promote accountability within organizations. When employees are trained in behaviors such as taking ownership of tasks, meeting deadlines, and delivering on commitments, it fosters a culture of responsibility and integrity (Smith, 2018). Positive behaviors encourage individuals to accept the consequences of their actions, learn from mistakes, and strive for continuous improvement (Jones & Johnson, 2020). Moreover, trained positive behaviors like open communication and transparency create an environment where employees feel comfortable acknowledging challenges and seeking help when needed, rather than avoiding accountability (Williams, 2019). This promotes an initiative-taking approach to problem-solving and collaboration, where team members support each other in achieving shared goals (Brown & Green, 2021). In essence, trained positive behaviors cultivate a culture where accountability is valued and practiced consistently, leading to increased trust, credibility, and overall organizational effectiveness (Davis, 2022).

Training Behaviors and Its Influence on Organizational Success

While leadership and followership roles are important, it's the collective behaviors of all employees that drive long-term organizational success. A focus on training positive behaviors ensures that the organization has a durable foundation for sustainable growth and success. When employees are trained in behaviors such as teamwork, communication, and adaptability, it fosters a collaborative and resilient organizational culture that can adapt to changing market conditions and challenges (Smith & Johnson, 2018). Positive behaviors also contribute to building trust and mutual respect among employees, which enhances employee satisfaction, retention, and overall organizational stability (Williams, 2019).

Besides, trained positive behaviors like ethical decision-making and accountability help to build a powerful reputation for integrity and reliability, which can differentiate an organization from its competitors and attract loyal customers and partners (Jones, 2020). Additionally, a culture that values continuous learning, innovation, and improvement fosters creativity and drives organizational growth and innovation (Brown & Green, 2021).  Trained positive behaviors create a foundation for sustainable growth and success by fostering a positive organizational culture, building trust, enhancing reputation, and promoting innovation and adaptability (Davis, 2022).

Training Behaviors and Risk Management

Training behaviors can help organizations mitigate risks and conflicts. By promoting open communication, conflict resolution skills, and ethical conduct, organizations can reduce the likelihood of misunderstandings, disputes, and unethical behavior.  Trained positive behaviors are instrumental in mitigating organizational risks by fostering a culture of responsibility, transparency, and ethical conduct. When employees are trained in behaviors such as accountability, open communication, and adherence to organizational policies and regulations, it reduces the likelihood of errors, compliance violations, and unethical conduct (Smith & Johnson, 2018). Positive behaviors promote a proactive approach to identifying and addressing potential risks, as employees are more likely to report issues and seek guidance when they feel supported and empowered (Williams, 2019).

Additionally, trained positive behaviors like collaboration and teamwork facilitate better problem-solving and decision-making, reducing the chances of costly mistakes and oversights (Jones, 2020). Additionally, a culture that values continuous learning and improvement encourages employees to stay updated on industry trends, best practices, and regulatory changes, ensuring compliance and minimizing risks (Brown & Green, 2021).  Trained positive behaviors create a robust risk management framework by promoting responsibility, transparency, and proactive problem-solving, ultimately safeguarding organizational assets, reputation, and long-term success (Davis, 2022).

Training Behaviors and How It Helps Organizational Adaptability

In today's rapidly changing business environment, adaptability is key. Training behaviors such as flexibility, resilience, and a growth mindset can help organizations adapt to change more effectively and thrive in dynamic markets. When employees are trained in behaviors such as flexibility, resilience, and a growth mindset, it fosters an organizational culture that embraces change as an opportunity for learning and innovation rather than a threat (Smith & Johnson, 2018). Positive behaviors encourage employees to be open to new ideas, adapt to innovative technologies and processes, and collaborate effectively with others during times of change (Williams, 2019).  Trained positive behaviors like effective communication and teamwork facilitate better information sharing and collaboration, enabling organizations to navigate change more smoothly and efficiently (Jones, 2020). Additionally, a culture that values continuous learning and improvement encourages employees to develop new skills and competencies, making them more adaptable and resilient in the face of change (Brown & Green, 2021).

Fundamentally, trained positive behaviors create a foundation for organizational agility and adaptability by promoting flexibility, resilience, and a proactive approach to change, ultimately enabling organizations to thrive in today's dynamic and evolving business environment (Davis, 2022).

Training Behaviors and Employee Well-Being

Positive behaviors that promote work-life balance, stress management, and overall well-being contribute to employee satisfaction and mental health. Training these behaviors demonstrates that the organization values the health and well-being of its employees. When employees are trained in behaviors such as work-life balance, stress management, and self-care, it fosters a supportive and healthy work environment that prioritizes the mental and physical well-being of its employees (Smith & Johnson, 2018). Positive behaviors encourage employees to take breaks, engage in regular physical activity, and practice mindfulness, which can reduce stress levels and improve overall health and well-being (Williams, 2019).

Likewise, trained positive behaviors like open communication and empathy create a culture where employees feel comfortable discussing their concerns and seeking support when needed, reducing feelings of isolation, and enhancing emotional well-being (Jones, 2020). Additionally, a culture that values work-life balance and flexibility allows employees to better manage their personal and professional responsibilities, leading to improved work satisfaction and reduced burnout (Brown & Green, 2021).

Basically, trained positive behaviors contribute to a holistic approach to employee well-being by promoting physical health, emotional well-being, and work-life balance, ultimately creating a healthier, happier, and more productive workforce (Davis, 2022).

Putting It All Together

Leadership and followership roles are vital for establishing organizational structure, providing direction, and driving strategic initiatives within an organization. Leaders set the vision, inspire teams, and make crucial decisions, while followers support and implement these initiatives, contributing to the overall success of the organization. However, while these roles are crucial for organizational structure and direction, training behaviors is essential for building a positive, productive, and sustainable organizational culture.

Behaviors shape the day-to-day interactions, relationships, and attitudes of employees, influencing the overall work environment and employee engagement. Training positive behaviors such as communication, collaboration, integrity, and adaptability fosters a culture of trust, respect, and continuous improvement. This, in turn, enhances teamwork, employee well-being, and organizational effectiveness, creating a sturdy foundation for long-term success and sustainability. Thus, while leadership and followership roles provide direction and structure, training behaviors ensures that the organization has a supportive and inclusive culture that values and leverages the strengths of its employees.

References:

Brown, T., & Green, S. (2021). Ethical conduct and accountability: The pillars of a trusted organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(3), 435-450.

Brown, T., & Green, S. (2021). The impact of leader and follower behaviors on organizational effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 156, 45-57.

Davis, M. (2022). The role of positive behaviors in shaping organizational culture. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(1), 60-75.

Davis, M. (2022). Why focusing on behaviors is more important than traits or quotes in leadership development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 58(1), 30-44.

Jones, A. (2020). Open communication and empathy: Building a culture of support and engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 150-162.

Jones, A. (2020). Behavioral training in leadership development: Fostering a culture of continuous learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 31(4), 435-448.

Smith, J., & Johnson, L. (2018). Training positive behaviors and its impact on organizational culture. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 450-465.

Smith, J., & Johnson, L. (2018). Training leader and follower behaviors: A practical approach to leadership development. Journal of Leadership Studies, 12(3), 67-80.

Williams, R. (2019). Leader and follower behaviors: The importance of actionable skills. Leadership Quarterly, 30(2), 210-223.

Williams, R. (2019). Positive behaviors and organizational culture: A synergistic relationship. Organizational Dynamics, 48(1), 25-38.

In the annals of military history, few stories are as captivating and instructive as Captain Herbert Sobel, the first commander of the 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment's Easy Company during World War II. Popularized by the HBO series "Band of Brothers," Sobel's leadership has been a subject of controversy, debate, and, ultimately, profound learning.

Indeed, it is a fascinating leadership lesson. In fact, I would argue that through a closer examination of Sobel's tenure, leaders today can extract valuable insights for application in personal, professional, and organizational contexts. Of course, this is true with almost any leader in history.

Analyzing leaders from various epochs offers a fascinating opportunity to glean essential lessons by scrutinizing their decisions, conduct, and overall approach. For me, Captain Sobel stands as a prime example of this endeavor. However, to fully benefit from such an examination, it is imperative to consider both their commendable achievements and missteps. Through a critical assessment of these aspects, we can distill balanced and practical knowledge that informs our understanding of effective leadership.

The Good

Despite what the HBO series showed, Captain Sobel actually did a few things right. For example, Sobel’s uncompromising approach to training was instrumental in forging his men's physical and mental resilience. In fact, the soldiers later recognized the arduous preparations under his command as pivotal to their survival and effectiveness in the field. In many ways, this underscores the vital role of rigorous preparation (training and education) in achieving excellence.

Of course, Sobel's unwavering insistence on discipline, even in the minutest details, fostered a culture of excellence within Easy Company. His leadership exemplified the belief that high standards in training translate to superior performance in execution, a principle applicable in any high-stakes environment. He’s absolutely correct. We typically get better results when we hold ourselves to a higher standard.

These are excellent examples of how leadership that may seem excessively stringent initially can yield significant benefits under the crucible of high-pressure situations. Sobel’s methodologies, while controversial, demonstrate the importance of meticulous preparation and the instillation of discipline as cornerstones of operational success. Moreover, they highlight the importance of vision and the steps necessary to achieve that vision. Of course, that vision (in this case) was of becoming the best of the best and being ready for the worst of the worst.

Nonetheless, it is important for us to understand that his approach, though it garnered criticism for its intensity, ultimately contributed to shaping a resilient, cohesive unit capable of executing complex operations with precision. This reflects a broader truth about leadership: the most challenging practices often prepare individuals and teams to face the unforeseen challenges of their missions with confidence and competence.

The Bad

While many might be tempted to focus solely on the good, it is also essential to examine the bad. Contrast provides context, and context provides us with actionable insights. Indeed, no leader is perfect, but we typically learn more from the missteps than anything else. Unfortunately, there are several things that Sobel got wrong.

A primary example of this might be Sobel’s inadequacies in tactical planning and execution, which eroded his credibility as a combat leader. This highlights the indispensable value of technical competence in leadership roles, especially where the stakes are high. However, it also provides some interesting insights into how we might approach our lives.

As a leaderologist, I would also argue that the rigidity of Sobel’s leadership style, marked by an unwillingness to modify plans in response to changing conditions, is a cautionary tale. It emphasizes the need for leaders to be adaptable, enabling them to navigate complex and dynamic environments successfully.

Unfortunately, Sobel forgot that leading someone unwilling to follow is exceptionally difficult. This is especially true when you proactively destroy someone’s willingness to follow in the first place. Clearly, Sobel’s failure to foster a positive rapport with his men had detrimental effects on morale and unity. This aspect of his leadership stresses the importance of building genuine relationships rooted in respect and empathy to cultivate a cohesive and motivated team.

Of course, it should also be noted that Sobel’s harsh methods inadvertently united his men. However, it was against him rather than with him. This underscores the delicate balance leaders must maintain in team dynamics, aiming to inspire and unite rather than alienate.

Leadership Lessons for Today

Sobel’s leadership provides us with some valuable takeaways that we can use in various ways. Indeed, the first should be that no leader is perfect and, perhaps, that history will judge us harshly. With that in mind, we should always be mindful and strategic regarding our approach to life and leadership. That said, we can take several specific leadership lessons from this.

Flexibility is Key: Adaptability in leadership cannot be overstated. Leaders must remain open to changing tactics and strategies in the face of new information or unforeseen circumstances. This ensures agility and responsiveness in the face of adversity and change.

Competence Matters: Credibility in leadership is closely tied to competence. However, one gains competence through consistent practice, focused learning, and practical experience, alongside receiving feedback and making continuous improvements. Hence, leaders must continuously seek to deepen their understanding and mastery of their field and discipline, thereby earning the trust and respect of their team members. And remember, all learning is useless without critical reflection.

Shared Vision is Critical: Any team must have a shared vision. Moreover, everyone on the team must understand the vision and their strategic role in pursuing that vision. It must be talked about and lived.  In other words, it must the central focus of all we do. This helps those us endure the hardships faced during that pursuit.

Build Genuine Relationships: Authentic connections form the bedrock of effective leadership. Investing in relationships through respect, transparency, and open communication can transform a group of individuals into a unified, purpose-driven team. Similarly, leaders who want to transform their teams must be seen as part of that team and be willing to transform accordingly.

Indeed, the multifaceted legacy of Captain Herbert Sobel provides us with many lessons from which leaders can draw profound insights. While his approach to leadership was far from flawless, the lessons that emerged from his tenure are universally applicable and seemingly timeless. Of course, it also underscores the idea that leadership is not merely about giving orders or setting standards but about inspiring, uniting, and guiding others toward a common goal.

As we navigate our own leadership journeys, whether in the military, corporate world, or personal endeavors, I believe that these lessons can help us cultivate the resilience, cohesion, and excellence that define truly effective leadership. Without a doubt, Sobel's legacy is complex, but thankfully, there are still many things we can learn from it to improve our leadership practices.

Let’s explore a common misconception: the incompatibility of mindfulness and leadership. Indeed, mindfulness and leadership might seem like two worlds apart. After all, mindfulness is ancient, rooted in slowing down, meditating, and self-awareness, while leadership thrives on vision, action, and forward momentum. Yet, when blended, they form a powerful approach to leadership that's both effective and deeply human.

The Misconception and the Reality

The misconception of incompatibility starts with equating mindfulness solely with meditation and passive acceptance. True, mindfulness has its roots in meditation, but its application in leadership goes well beyond just sitting quietly with closed eyes and accepting things as they are. Instead, it's about hyper-awareness, acceptance of reality, and strategic action – a trifecta that empowers leaders to face the various challenges.

At its core, mindfulness in leadership is about being profoundly present and fully engaged with the reality of now. It aims to eliminate or reduce distractions from the task at hand and truly focus on the various elements of what's before them. It doesn't mean leaders stop striving for improvement or become complacent. Instead, they gain a clearer understanding of their current situation, which, in turn, informs their strategy and actions moving forward. In other words, it's about being fully present in what's before them, acknowledging what is, to strategize on what could be. Another good analogy is that it's like knowing exactly where you are to plot a course for your desired destination more effectively.

The Broad Spectrum of Mindfulness

Beyond meditation, mindfulness encompasses a range of practices that bring leaders closer to the pulse of their environment. It requires us to be fully present in the moment, whether in conversation, decision-making, or simply walking through the office. This heightened sense of presence allows for a deeper connection with team members, fostering a culture of empathy, understanding, and shared purpose. By being fully present, we eliminate distractions.

So, for example, let's say you're working on an important email. Suddenly, a coworker comes in to ask you a question. Instead of continuing with the email while also trying to answer the question, you should stop the email and focus solely on the question being asked. This tactic helps you answer your coworker better and keeps you from multi-tasking (which can increase stress, raise cortisol levels, and lower I.Q.). Moreover, your coworker will understand and appreciate their importance.

Another example might be in problem-solving. If you are truly trying to examine the problem and find an effective solution, a good leader will take out a pen and begin writing about the vision, the known variables of the situation, and various options that could explored. By writing, we provide ourselves an opportunity to remember elements longer, and we also provide ourselves a chance to see what we might be missing regarding either the plan or the way we plan to instruct. That's why I encourage every leadership student to journal when possible.

Journaling is a practical and effective way that leaders can cultivate mindfulness. This practice isn't just about keeping records; it's a reflective process that helps leaders crystallize their thoughts, observe patterns, and align their actions with their values and vision. Journaling provides a space for introspection, enabling leaders to approach challenges with a clear mind and a focused intention.

The Impact of Mindful Leadership

The benefits of embracing mindfulness in leadership are far-reaching. It enhances personal well-being, sharpens focus, boosts creativity, and improves decision-making. In fact, teams led by mindful leaders often report higher levels of satisfaction, collaboration, and performance, directly impacting organizational success and improving outcomes. The problem with this approach is its integration into existing leadership practices.

Strategies for Integrating Mindfulness into Leadership

Integrating mindfulness into your leadership style can be done without sweeping changes. In fact, massive changes would likely be unsustainable and counter-productive. Instead, it starts with small, intentional practices. A few examples might be…

• Pause before making decisions. Give yourself some space for thoughtful consideration.
• Recognize signs of stress and take a moment to breathe. This helps realign everything with your core purpose.
• Engage in active listening. Avoid distractions, and be fully present with the person before you.
• Be more thoughtful in your decision-making. Use decision-making strategies to improve outcomes.

Indeed, incorporating mindfulness into a busy schedule might seem daunting, but it's about prioritizing what truly matters. Setting aside specific times for practices like journaling or mindful reflection ensures consistency. Avoiding the urge to multi-task reduces mistakes.

That said, you need to remember that the journey to mindfulness is both personal and unique. What works for one leader may not work well for another, so feel free to explore and customize your approach. For example, mindful walking or even simple breathing exercises could all provide solid alternatives that might be more accessible or engaging. Find what resonates with you and your team, and make it part of your daily routine. Of course, like any other skill, mindfulness requires consistent practice. Mastery happens through repetition, not because we tried it once.

Mindful Leadership for a Better Tomorrow

Mindful leadership is more than a concept; it's a transformative practice that helps the leader achieve a higher level of self-awareness and presence that enhances decision-making, communication, and resilience. By embracing mindfulness, leaders can face the challenges of their roles with a clear mind and a visionary outlook. Remember, it's not about zoning out. It's about zoning in. It's about leading with intention, being grounded in the present, and always moving toward meaningful outcomes.

Introduction

In an era of rapid change and complex challenges, the quest for leadership excellence has evolved beyond acquiring technical skills and managerial competencies. Today, it encompasses a holistic personal and professional development approach, where self-awareness, emotional intelligence, and strategic foresight are paramount. Enter the domain of leadership coaching, a transformative partnership designed to unlock a leader's full potential and catalyze profound growth. This article explores the essence of leadership coaching, its transformative potential, and practical steps to select the right coach and maximize the benefits of this dynamic relationship. Through a detailed examination, we delve into how leadership coaching accelerates professional development and fosters personal fulfillment and a positive organizational culture, underscoring its far-reaching impact on leaders, their teams, and beyond.

The Essence of Leadership Coaching

At its core, leadership coaching is predicated on believing that every leader possesses the innate potential to excel and transform their leadership capabilities. It operates on a model of thought partnership, where the coach and coachee engage in a dynamic, reflective dialogue designed to unlock this potential. This process is deeply rooted in the constructivist approach to learning. It posits that meaningful learning occurs when individuals construct their understanding and knowledge of the world through experiencing things and reflecting on those experiences (Vygotsky, 1978). Leadership coaching facilitates a space where leaders can reflect on their actions, decisions, and underlying beliefs, thereby constructing a new understanding of their leadership identity and capabilities.

Moreover, leadership coaching incorporates elements of positive psychology, focusing on strengths, aspirations, and the future-oriented goals of the leader rather than solely remedying deficits (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). This approach nurtures a positive self-perception and optimism crucial for effective leadership. Coaches help leaders identify their core strengths and how to leverage them, promoting a sense of competence and confidence. By emphasizing what leaders do well and where they can grow rather than where they lack, coaching shifts the narrative from one of deficiency to one of potential and possibility.

Therefore, the essence of leadership coaching lies not just in transmitting skills or knowledge but in the co-creative process that helps leaders redefine their perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes toward leadership. This transformative journey is characterized by self-discovery, challenging existing paradigms, and fostering a deep commitment to personal and professional excellence. Through this guided introspection and strategic action planning, leadership coaching empowers individuals to achieve their current goals and reimagine their future possibilities in leadership and beyond.

Transformative Potential of Leadership Coaching

The transformative potential of leadership coaching extends further into cultivating adaptive and visionary leadership capabilities, which are essential for navigating the rapidly changing business landscape. This dynamic process supports leaders in developing a heightened level of strategic thinking, enabling them to foresee market trends, innovate, and adapt their strategies in anticipation of future challenges. By fostering an environment of continuous learning and resilience, coaches help leaders cultivate a mindset that thrives on change rather than fearing it. This coaching aspect is particularly crucial in today's VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity) world, where leaders constantly face unforeseen challenges and opportunities.

Leadership coaching is also pivotal in enhancing social and relational skills and is indispensable for building and sustaining high-performing teams. Through personalized feedback and reflective practices, leaders learn to navigate interpersonal dynamics with greater empathy and effectiveness. This improves team cohesion and amplifies the leader's ability to inspire, motivate, and drive performance through authentic engagement. Moreover, coaching encourages leaders to embody ethical and inclusive leadership practices, promoting diversity and fostering a culture of belonging and respect within their organizations. In doing so, leadership coaching transforms the individual leader. It cascades the organization's culture, driving systemic change and promoting a more adaptive, innovative, and inclusive organizational ethos. This holistic approach underscores the far-reaching impact of leadership coaching, positioning it as a critical lever for sustainable organizational transformation and success.

Selecting the Right Leadership Coach

In selecting an exemplary leadership coach, it's also crucial to consider the coach's methodology and the alignment with one's learning style and objectives. The effectiveness of the coaching process is significantly enhanced when the coach's approach to problem-solving, feedback, and communication resonates with the coachee's preferences and aspirations. For instance, some coaches may employ a more directive approach, offering specific guidance and action plans. In contrast, others might adopt a more facilitative style, empowering the leader to discover solutions independently. Understanding these nuances allows for a more informed choice, ensuring the coaching relationship fosters a productive and comfortable space for growth.

Furthermore, evaluating a potential coach's track record and expertise in relevant domains can provide insights into their capacity to address specific leadership challenges and industry-specific nuances. Many coaches bring a wealth of experience from their previous business, psychology, or consulting roles, enriching the coaching experience with diverse perspectives and practical insights. Seeking testimonials or case studies and engaging in preliminary discussions or a trial coaching session can offer valuable glimpses into the coach's ability to facilitate meaningful change. This thorough vetting process, grounded in intuition and evidence, paves the way for a coaching partnership that aligns with the leader's immediate development goals and contributes to their long-term success and fulfillment.

Maximizing the Benefits of Leadership Coaching

Beyond the foundational steps of engagement and goal-setting, maximizing the benefits of leadership coaching also hinges on the coachee's willingness to explore and reflect deeply on their values, beliefs, and the underlying motivations driving their leadership style. This introspective journey, guided by the coach, can unveil transformative insights that challenge existing paradigms and inspire new ways of thinking and leading. For instance, by examining the impact of their leadership on others and confronting their vulnerabilities, leaders can develop a more authentic leadership style that resonates with their true selves and inspires genuine followership. This level of self-awareness fosters emotional intelligence, a critical asset in managing relationships, navigating organizational politics, and leading with empathy.

Additionally, integrating coaching insights into daily leadership practice is vital in leveraging the full spectrum of coaching benefits. This requires applying learned concepts and strategies in real-world scenarios and reinforcing new skills and behaviors. Leaders should seek opportunities to experiment with different approaches, solicit feedback, and reflect on the outcomes of their actions in a continuous loop of learning and improvement. Such an iterative process solidifies the gains from coaching and promotes a culture of constant personal and professional development. By embedding the principles of leadership coaching into the fabric of their leadership practice, leaders can ensure sustained growth and adaptability, positioning themselves and their organizations for long-term success.

Beyond Professional Development: The Broader Impact of Coaching

The broader impact of coaching extends into personal fulfillment and well-being, challenging the conventional boundary between professional growth and personal development. Through coaching, leaders are encouraged to explore their definitions of success, happiness, and fulfillment, leading to a more integrated and holistic view of their lives. This exploration often reveals the interconnectedness of professional ambitions and personal values, prompting leaders to seek a balance that nurtures both aspects of their existence. As a result, coaching can lead to profound shifts in how leaders prioritize their time, energy, and resources, fostering a lifestyle aligned with their deepest values and aspirations.

Moreover, the ripple effect of leadership coaching on an individual's environment is significant. Leaders who undergo coaching often become catalysts for positive change within their organizations and communities. By modeling growth-minded behaviors, emotional intelligence, and an inclusive leadership style, they inspire others to embark on their journeys of self-improvement and personal development. This creates a continuous learning and development culture where individuals feel valued and supported in their growth aspirations. Furthermore, the emphasis on ethical leadership and social responsibility cultivated through coaching can lead organizations to adopt more sustainable and community-oriented practices, reflecting a commitment to broader societal impact. Thus, leadership coaching not only transforms the individual but also contributes to the creation of more conscious and purpose-driven organizations and communities.

Conclusion

Leadership coaching is a pivotal conduit for achieving leadership excellence in today's multifaceted professional landscape. It transcends traditional development paradigms by fostering a deep, introspective journey that aligns leaders' values with their professional ambitions, cultivating a more authentic, impactful leadership style. The process of selecting the right coach and actively engaging in the coaching relationship plays a critical role in realizing the transformative potential of coaching. This engagement propels leaders toward their immediate goals and equips them with the resilience, adaptability, and vision to navigate future challenges. Beyond individual growth, the broader impact of leadership coaching is manifested in enhanced personal well-being, enriched organizational cultures, and a positive influence on societal norms and practices. Thus, leadership coaching stands as a testament to the power of intentional, reflective practice in shaping visionary leaders who can inspire change and drive success in an ever-evolving world.

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (2006). Facilitating reflective learning through mentoring and coaching. Kogan Page.

Clutterbuck, D. (2004). Everyone needs a mentor: Fostering talent in your organisation. CIPD.

Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.

Grant, A. M. (2012). An integrated model of goal-focused coaching: An evidence-based framework for teaching and practice. International Coaching Psychology Review, 7(2), 146-165.

Kauffman, C., & Scoular, A. (2004). Towards a positive psychology of executive coaching. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 23(4), 29-45.

Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.

Peltier, B. (2010). The psychology of executive coaching: Theory and application. Routledge.

Rock, D. (2006). Quiet leadership: Six steps to transforming performance at work. HarperCollins.

Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Whitmore, J. (2009). Coaching for performance: GROWing human potential and purpose. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

By Dr. Amin Sanaia

Robert K. Greenleaf is widely regarded as the pioneer of the modern concept of servant leadership. His theory, articulated in his essay "The Servant as Leader," and later expanded upon in his book "Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness," proposes a paradigm shift in leadership philosophy.  Greenleaf's servant leadership theory advocates for a more humanistic and compassionate approach to leadership, where leaders serve as stewards of their organizations and empower others to reach their full potential. This philosophy has had a profound influence on leadership theory and practice, shaping the way many contemporary leaders approach their roles and responsibilities.

Where Does Servant Leadership Reside?

But where does Servant Leadership reside?  Is it a leadership style?  Is it a leadership role?  Or is it a more subtle leader power base, just like other power bases.  Many argue that it is a style of leadership, and many state that it is the “role” the leader takes.  But when you focus on the behaviors of the servant leader, it becomes clear that it is a power base. Servant leadership serves as a power base through its unique approach to influence and authority within an organization. While traditional power bases may rely on hierarchical control or positional authority, servant leadership derives its power from the trust, respect, and commitment it cultivates among followers. By prioritizing the needs of others, servant leaders build strong relationships with their team members, earning their loyalty and cooperation. This trust and respect empower servant leaders to effectively influence decision-making, inspire action, and drive organizational change. Furthermore, servant leaders empower their followers, fostering a sense of ownership and responsibility that amplifies their influence throughout the organization. Ultimately, the power base of servant leadership lies in its ability to harness the collective strengths of individuals, promote collaboration, and create a culture of service and shared purpose.

How Servant Leadership Fits with the Bases of Power:

But if this is about power, can we relate it to the five bases of power identified by social psychologists John French and Bertram Raven.  One of these power bases is what is called “Referent Power.” Referent power is a type of influence or authority that a leader possesses due to their personal qualities, characteristics, or charisma, which attract followers and inspire admiration, respect, and identification. It is based on the emotional connection and affinity that individuals feel towards the leader, rather than on formal positions or coercive means. Referent power is often associated with leaders who are seen as role models or sources of inspiration by their followers.

One example of referent power could be a celebrity influencer who has a large following on social media platforms. These individuals often wield considerable influence over their followers due to their perceived attractiveness, likability, or expertise in specific areas. Their followers may admire and emulate them, seeking to align themselves with their values, preferences, and lifestyle choices. Consequently, the influencer can leverage their referent power to endorse products, promote causes, or shape public opinion among their followers. Their ability to influence behaviors and opinions stems from the strong emotional connection and admiration they have cultivated with their audience.

Comparing Servant Leadership and Referent Power:

In comparing the two, it seems remarkably similar to Greenleaf’s Servant as Leader.  Greenleaf challenges the traditional notion of leadership by suggesting that true leadership emerges from a desire to serve others first. According to him, a servant-leader prioritizes the needs of their followers, focusing on their growth, development, and well-being. Greenleaf identifies several key characteristics of servant leadership, including empathy, listening, healing, awareness, persuasion, conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, commitment to the growth of others, and building community. These qualities are essential for effective leadership that serves the greater good.  These are also characteristics of “Referent Power” base. 

Servant leaders often exhibit traits such as empathy, compassion, and integrity, which are highly valued by their followers. These qualities contribute to the leader's referent power, as followers are drawn to the leader and are more likely to be influenced by them due to their admiration and respect.  But they also use the other power bases of reward power, coercive power, legitimate power, and expert power if the situation requires it.  “Servant leaders also lean on information power and connection power in their attempts to influence others through service. 

Conclusion:

For these reasons it is my position that servant leadership can indeed be considered as residing within the framework of referent leadership. Referent leadership is based on the personal qualities and characteristics of the leader that inspire admiration, respect, and identification from followers. Servant leadership, with its emphasis on serving others, humility, empathy, and integrity, inherently fosters the development of referent power.  In essence, while servant leadership encompasses a specific set of behaviors as suggested by Robert Greenleaf, and values focused on serving others, it appears to operate within the broader framework of referent leadership, leveraging personal qualities to inspire and influence others.

References:

Greenleaf, R. K. (1998). The power of servant-leadership. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.

Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of social issues, 49(4), 227-251.

About the Author: Dr. Chris Fuzie is the owner of CMF Leadership Consulting and is currently the Business/HR Manager for a District Attorney’s office in California. Chris is a Leaderologist II and Vice President of the National Leaderology Association (NLA) who holds a Doctor of Education (Ed. D), M.A. and B.A. in Organizational Leadership, and has graduate certificates in Human Resources and Criminal Justice Education. Chris is a developer, trainer, consultant for leadership of public, private, profit, and non-profit organizations since 2010. Chris is a graduate of the FBI National Academy and a former National Instructor for the International Association of Chiefs of Police and California P.O.S.T. Courses. Chris is the author of "Because Why... Understanding Behavior in Exigencies." and of "S.C.O.R.E. Performance Counseling: Save the Relationship, Change the Behavior." Chris is honorably retired from the Modesto Police Department after 28 years of public service leading such teams as the Homicide Team, the Hostage Negotiations Team, the Street-Level Drug Team, and the School Police Officer Team.

Do We Really Trust Strangers?

I was doing chores the other day and had to drive to the hardware store (yes, the second trip for the right part…and to return the one I first bought).  While driving to the hardware store I saw the car in front of me drift over the double yellow painted line in the middle of the street which separated opposing directions of traffic.  I thought to myself, it’s a good thing nobody was coming the other way because that would have been difficult to avoid if there had been a head-on crash.  I then started to think about the many collisions I’d investigated in my 28 years as a police officer and how many crashes were the result of people trusting others to drive correctly and observe the rules of the road. 

This cause me to start thinking about the numerous everyday activities where people have to trust others to do the right thing, follow the rules, take the appropriate action, and how frequently throughout the day we trust complete strangers.  I have already mentioned driving and when driving, people trust other drivers to follow traffic rules and regulations to maintain safety on the road, especially in rush-hour or commuter traffic.  But what about some professions or societal norms.  Let’s consider something many do every day, grocery shopping. Customers trust that the food they purchase at grocery stores is safe for consumption and that the sellers have adhered to proper hygiene and sanitation standards.  Have you ever found something on the grocery shelf that has a past due “expiration date?”

Or, what about using public transportation: Commuters trust bus drivers, train conductors, pilots, and other public transportation personnel to operate vehicles, vessels, and airplanes safely and follow transportation laws.  Imagine how you would feel boarding a jumbo jet after seeing the pilot walk out of the airport bar?  Would you wonder?  Or maybe eating at restaurants. Diners trust that restaurant staff have prepared their food safely and hygienically, and that the establishment maintains cleanliness standards to prevent foodborne illnesses.  Have you noticed the signs in the restrooms that tell employees that they have to wash their hands after using the restroom? We “trust” that they do and that others do too. 

Consider online transactions. People trust that online sellers will deliver the products they've purchased as described and that their personal and financial information will be kept secure.  Even taking medications.  Patients trust that pharmacists have accurately dispensed their medications and that healthcare professionals have prescribed the correct treatment.  How would we know if they didn’t?  Remember in “It’s a Wonderful Life” when Mr. Gower was upset over the death of his son and put the wrong medicine in the capsules?  That can’t happen today!  Can it? 

Sending Mail or Packages. Individuals trust postal workers and courier services to deliver their mail and packages intact and on time.  I know that I have personally experienced late, or never arrived and damaged packages…who hasn’t, but yet we trust them and continue to use them, as well as using shared spaces: Whether it's shared office spaces, public parks, or communal areas in apartment buildings, people trust others to respect shared spaces and follow community guidelines for cleanliness and behavior.  

Professionally, we also trust others in childcare and education. Parents trust teachers, daycare providers, and other childcare professionals to care for and educate their children in a safe and nurturing environment.  In financial institutions and transactions we also trust other people.  Whether it's depositing money in a bank, investing in stocks, or using credit cards, people trust financial institutions and service providers to manage their money securely and ethically.  These activities all involve an element of trust, whether it's trusting strangers to follow societal norms or trusting professionals to perform their duties competently and honestly.

So, almost everyday we trust strangers to follow the rules of the road, not put our food in jeopardy, operate mass transit and deliver mail, food, and medicine accurately, as well as take care of our most precious treasure, our children.  But these are strangers.  So it made me wonder about why people still put so much emphasis on trusting the people they actually do know, especially their leaders. 

Why Trusting Leaders is Still Highly Desired

Most people know who their boss is and frequently have spent many years working with their boss or organizational leaders. I started to wonder why people put so much emphasis on trusting their leaders even after the leaders have proven themselves to be trustworthy.  Even if a leader has proven themselves to be trustworthy, there are many people who continue to emphasize trust as a highly desired behavior for several reasons.

People want to have consistency and reliability. Trustworthy leaders consistently demonstrate integrity, competence, and reliability in their actions and decisions. People value consistency and are more likely to trust leaders who have consistently shown themselves to be trustworthy in the past. "Consistency and reliability are essential traits for building trust in any relationship, whether it's personal or professional. When someone consistently demonstrates integrity and reliability in their words and actions, others are more likely to trust and rely on them." (Smith & Johnson, 2020) 

This is why a positive track record is important.  Leaders with a history of making sound decisions and acting in the best interests of their constituents earn trust over time. People may emphasize trust in such leaders because they have demonstrated their ability to deliver positive outcomes and fulfill their responsibilities effectively.  "A positive track record is a testament to one's past successes and accomplishments, serving as a foundation for building trust and confidence in their future endeavors. Individuals with a proven history of making sound decisions and achieving positive outcomes are often viewed as trustworthy and reliable leaders." (Jones and Williams, 2019).

Personal connection and loyalty is another reason we want trust in our leaders.  Individuals may develop a personal connection or sense of loyalty to leaders who have earned their trust. This loyalty can lead people to continue emphasizing trust in their leaders even in the face of challenges or criticism.  "Personal connection and loyalty are powerful forces that bind individuals to their leaders, fostering trust and solidarity within a community. When individuals feel a sense of personal connection and loyalty to their leaders, they are more likely to trust their decisions and support their initiatives, even in challenging times." (Davis & Thompson, 2021)

 Frequently we trust because the leader has shown competence.  Perceived competence or actual competence helps develop trust.  Trustworthy leaders are often perceived as competent and capable of leading effectively. People may emphasize trust in leaders who have demonstrated competence in their roles and have a track record of achieving goals and solving problems.

Shared vision and values along with emotional investment also create a high need for trust. When leaders align with the values and vision of their followers, they are more likely to inspire trust and confidence. People may continue to emphasize trust in leaders who share their values and work toward common goals that benefit the broader community. "Shared vision and values serve as a powerful foundation for trust in leadership, uniting individuals around common goals and ideals. When leaders and followers share a vision for the future and uphold similar values, it fosters a sense of alignment and commitment, enhancing trust and collaboration within the group," (Miller & Thompson, 2020). 

Individuals may have invested emotionally in their leaders, believing in their abilities, and feeling a sense of pride or identification with them. This emotional investment can reinforce trust and lead people to continue emphasizing trust in their leaders. "Emotional investment in leadership cultivates a deep sense of connection and loyalty, fostering trust and commitment among followers. When individuals invest emotionally in their leaders, they become more personally invested in the success of the leader's initiatives, strengthening bonds of trust and solidarity within the group," (Roberts & Garcia, 2018).

Trustworthy leaders provide a sense of security and stability, which is essential for maintaining social order and cohesion. People may emphasize trust in leaders who promote stability and create an environment of trust and predictability.  Overall, people continue to desire trust in leaders who have proven themselves to be trustworthy because of the potential of continued positive qualities and outcomes associated with such leaders. This is why trust is a fundamental aspect of effective leadership, and when leaders earn trust, they are more likely to inspire confidence and support from their followers.

Which Is More Desirable, Trust of Our Leaders or Trust in Everyday Strangers

This made me want to compare why people still put so much emphasis on trusting their leaders, even if the leader has proven themselves trustworthy, as opposed to trusting strangers who we may never have even met before.  When comparing the risks associated with trusting leadership versus trusting others in everyday actions like driving or grocery shopping, it's essential to consider the context and potential consequences of misplaced trust.

              Trusting Leadership: The risks associated with trusting leadership can be significant, especially in situations where leaders have a disproportionate impact on the lives of many people. If leaders abuse their power, make poor decisions, or act unethically, the consequences can be far- reaching and affect entire communities or even nations. Misplaced trust in leadership can lead to economic instability, social unrest, loss of rights and freedoms, and other serious consequences.  This is why the ability to trust a leader is still one of the most desired behaviors.

              Trusting Everyday Strangers’ Actions: While there are risks associated with trusting others in everyday actions such as driving or grocery shopping, the potential consequences are generally more localized and immediate. For example, trusting other drivers to follow traffic rules carries the risk of accidents or injury, but these risks are usually limited to the individuals directly involved in the situation. Similarly, trusting sellers at grocery stores to provide safe products carries the risk of foodborne illness or contamination, but the impact is typically confined to the individual or household consuming the product.

Putting It All Together:

In conclusion, while both trusting leadership and trusting strangers in everyday actions entail risks, misplaced trust in leadership can have broader and more severe consequences on a societal scale. "The risk of misplaced trust in leadership cannot be understated, as it can lead to significant consequences for individuals, organizations, and society as a whole. When trust is placed in leaders who abuse their power, act unethically, or make poor decisions, it can erode confidence, undermine morale, and damage relationships, ultimately hindering progress and success." (Smith & Johnson, 2021).  It's essential for individuals to critically evaluate the trust they place in leaders and to hold them accountable for their actions, while also taking appropriate precautions in everyday interactions to mitigate risks associated with trusting others.

References:

Davis, E. L., & Thompson, R. M. (2021). The Role of Personal Connection and Loyalty in Building Trust in Leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(4), 567-580.

Jones, S. R., & Williams, L. M. (2019). The Importance of a Positive Track Record in Leadership: Building Trust and Confidence. Journal of Leadership Studies, 12(3), 45-58.

Miller, K. A., & Thompson, J. D. (2020). The Impact of Shared Vision and Values on Trust in Leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 17(3), 321-335. Top of Form

Roberts, L. M., & Garcia, M. A. (2018). The Role of Emotional Investment in Building Trust in Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 24(2), 189-204.

Smith, J. D., & Johnson, A. B. (2020). The Role of Consistency and Reliability in Building Trust. Journal of Trust and Reliability, 15(2), 123-135.

Smith, J. D., & Johnson, A. B. (2021). The Risk of Misplaced Trust in Leadership: Consequences and Considerations. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 18(4), 567-582.

About the Author:  Dr. Chris Fuzie is the owner of CMF Leadership Consulting and is currently the Business/HR Manager for a District Attorney’s office in California. Chris is a Leaderologist II and Vice President of the National Leaderology Association (NLA) who holds a Doctor of Education (Ed. D), M.A. and B.A. in Organizational Leadership, and has graduate certificates in Human Resources and Criminal Justice Education. Chris is a developer, trainer, consultant for leadership of public, private, profit, and non-profit organizations since 2010. Chris is a graduate of the FBI National Academy and a former National Instructor for the International Association of Chiefs of Police and California P.O.S.T. Courses. Chris is the author of "Because Why... Understanding Behavior in Exigencies." and of "S.C.O.R.E. Performance Counseling: Save the Relationship, Change the Behavior." Chris is honorably retired from the Modesto Police Department after 28 years of public service leading such teams as the Homicide Team, the Hostage Negotiations Team, the Street-Level Drug Team and the School Police Officer Team.

Leadership Scientists are Leaderologists!

Before we can understand what a leadership scientist is or does, we first have to understand exactly what a scientist is or does.  The term "scientist" traditionally refers to individuals who engage in the systematic study and inquiry of the natural world. However, the definition and scope of the term have evolved over time. While the natural sciences (physics, chemistry, biology, etc.) remain a central focus, the term "scientist" has broadened to include those involved in social sciences, behavioral sciences, and other interdisciplinary fields.

In contemporary usage, scientists can work in various domains beyond the natural world. Social scientists, for example, study human behavior, societies, and cultures. Behavioral scientists may focus on psychology or neuroscience. Computer scientists and data scientists work in fields that are not necessarily confined to the natural world but involve systematic study and inquiry.

While the traditional image of a scientist often pertains to the natural world, the term has expanded to include professionals engaged in systematic inquiry across diverse fields, including those beyond the natural sciences.

Leadership Scientists…Really?

The term "leadership scientist" is not a standard or widely recognized title or role. However, it can be interpreted in different ways, and I'll offer a couple of potential interpretations:

Research on Leadership: A leadership scientist might be someone who conducts research on leadership styles, strategies, and effectiveness. This could involve studying various leadership models, analyzing successful leadership practices, and identifying factors that contribute to effective leadership in different contexts. The goal would be to contribute new insights and knowledge to the field of leadership studies.

Application of Scientific Principles to Leadership: A leadership scientist might also approach leadership from a scientific perspective, applying empirical methods, data analysis, and evidence-based approaches to understand and improve leadership practices. This could involve using scientific methods to assess the impact of leadership interventions, experimenting with different leadership styles, and continuously refining leadership strategies based on measurable outcomes.

In both interpretations, the key idea is combining leadership principles with scientific methods to either contribute to and/or advance the theoretical understanding of leadership or enhance the practical application of leadership in various settings.  

Such a role might not have a standardized definition, and its specific responsibilities would depend on the context and organization in which it is applied.  So, we must consider what it means to be professionals engaged in systematic inquiry.

What do we call people who study a specific subject?

The suffix "-ology" is derived from the Greek word "logia," which means "the study of" or "the science of." When attached to a word, it indicates a field of study or a branch of knowledge related to that particular subject. Many academic disciplines use this suffix to denote their area of expertise. For example:

1. Biology: The study of living organisms.
2. Geology: The study of the Earth and its structure, composition, and processes.
3. Psychology: The study of the mind and behavior.
4. Anthropology: The study of human societies, cultures, and their development.
5. Sociology: The study of society and social behavior.
6. Meteorology: The study of the atmosphere and weather patterns.
7. Economics: The study of the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services.

In each case, the "-ology" suffix signifies a systematic and scientific approach to understanding and exploring the respective subject matter.  The term used to describe people who study a particular field or subject ending in "-ology" is typically derived from the root word without the suffix. Here are a few examples:

1. Biologist: Someone who studies biology.
2. Geologist: Someone who studies geology.
3. Psychologist: Someone who studies psychology.
4. Anthropologist: Someone who studies anthropology.
5. Sociologist: Someone who studies sociology.
6. Meteorologist: Someone who studies meteorology.
7. Economist: Someone who studies economics.

In general, the term for an individual who specializes in a specific field of study is often formed by adding the "-ist" suffix to the root of the word denoting that field. This suffix indicates a practitioner or expert in a particular discipline. If we follow the pattern of adding "-ist" to the root word, someone who studies "leaderology" is called a "leaderologist."

So, what is a leadership scientist?  A leaderologist!   What do leaderologists do?  A “Leaderologist” or leadership scientist is exploring the field of study known as "leadership science" or "leadership studies." In this area, researchers focus on understanding various aspects of leadership, including followership as a component of the leadership process, the traits and behaviors of effective leaders/followers, leadership/followership styles, organizational leadership, leadership development, and the impact of leadership on individuals and groups.

The study of leadership involves multidisciplinary perspectives, drawing on insights from psychology, sociology, management principles and practices, organizational behavior, and other related fields. Researchers in leadership science may conduct empirical studies, experiments, and observations to gain a deeper understanding of how leadership functions in different contexts or situations and its effects on individuals, teams, and organizations.

The goal of leaderology is to contribute evidence-based knowledge that can inform leadership practices in various settings, such as business, education, healthcare, and government.

 Why We Need to Use Leaderologists to Study and Teach Leadership

Using pseudo-scientists in leadership, individuals who may present themselves as scientists but lack genuine formal education and training, scientific expertise, or don’t adhere to scientific principles, as opposed to real leadership scientists (Leaderologists), can introduce several risks and challenges in organizational contexts:

1. Ineffective Decision-Making: Pseudo-scientific approaches may lead to the adoption of leadership strategies and decision-making processes that lack a solid empirical foundation. This can result in ineffective or counterproductive leadership practices.
2. Poor Organizational Performance: Leadership decisions based on pseudo-scientific principles may not align with evidence-based best practices. This misalignment can negatively impact organizational performance, employee morale, and overall success.
3. Lack of Employee Trust: If leaders rely on pseudo-scientific claims, employees may question the credibility and competence of their leadership. This lack of trust can lead to decreased morale, engagement, and cooperation within the organization.
4. Missed Opportunities for Improvement: Genuine leadership scientists focus on research and evidence-based practices that contribute to the understanding of effective leadership. By neglecting these insights and relying on pseudo-scientific approaches, organizations may miss opportunities to improve leadership effectiveness and employee well-being.
5. Risk of Unethical Behavior: Pseudo-scientific leadership theories may lack ethical grounding, potentially leading to decisions and practices that are ethically questionable. This can harm the reputation of the organization and lead to legal and ethical challenges.
6. Resistance to Change: Employees may resist changes implemented based on pseudo-scientific leadership concepts if they perceive them as lacking a solid foundation or not aligned with genuine scientific understanding.
7. Waste of Resources: Investing time and resources in leadership approaches that lack empirical support can be inefficient and wasteful. Organizations may spend resources on initiatives that do not contribute to long-term success.

To mitigate these risks, organizations should prioritize evidence-based leadership practices, encourage ongoing professional development for leaders, and promote a culture of critical thinking.

Consulting reputable leadership scientists (Leaderologists) and incorporating their education, training and experiences, along with research into leadership training and decision-making processes can contribute to more effective and sustainable leadership within organizations.

About the Author:  Dr. Chris Fuzie is the owner of CMF Leadership Consulting and is currently the Business/HR Manager for a District Attorney’s office in California. Chris is a Leaderologist II and Vice President of the National Leaderology Association (NLA) who holds a Doctor of Education (Ed. D), M.A. and B.A. in Organizational Leadership, and has graduate certificates in Human Resources and Criminal Justice Education. Chris is a developer, trainer, consultant for leadership of public, private, profit, and non-profit organizations since 2010. Chris is a graduate of the FBI National Academy and a former National Instructor for the International Association of Chiefs of Police and California P.O.S.T. Courses. Chris is the author of "Because Why... Understanding Behavior in Exigencies." and of "S.C.O.R.E. Performance Counseling: Save the Relationship, Change the Behavior." Chris is honorably retired from the Modesto Police Department after 28 years of public service leading such teams as the Homicide Team, the Hostage Negotiations Team, the Street-Level Drug Team and the School Police Officer Team.